view release on metacpan or  search on metacpan

benchmarking/bench-streamd.pl  view on Meta::CPAN

#   4. row forms           -- positional arrays vs tagged objects (the
#      tagged form pays hashref building + tagged_row_to_array).
#   5. concurrent clients  -- total throughput with 1/2/4 connections
#      pumping at once.  The daemon is a single select loop sharing one
#      model, so this should stay ~flat: it measures fairness overhead,
#      not parallel speedup.
#   6. command latency     -- ping round trips (pure protocol floor)
#      and the wall cost of an on-demand save.
#
# Reference numbers (2026-07-08, 8-core dev box, C backend,
# Cpanel::JSON::XS, 100 trees, window 2048, eta 32, 5 features):
# in-process score_learn ~2,770 pts/s; over the socket ~2,700 pts/s at
# any batch >= 16 (~2% overhead) and ~2,500 pts/s even at batch 1;
# score mode ~29,000 pts/s (no learning -- the tree walk is cheap, the
# learn is what costs); tagged objects ~21,000 vs positional ~30,000 in
# score mode; throughput is flat across 1/2/4 concurrent clients (one
# shared model, one loop -- by design); ping ~29,000 round trips/s;
# save ~140 ms.  The wire is nowhere near the bottleneck -- the model
# is.
#
# Run with: