Alien-TinyCCx
view release on metacpan or search on metacpan
src/tests/tcctest.c view on Meta::CPAN
s.b2 = 0;
glob3 = 43;
compare_comparisons (&s);
}
int fcompare (double a, double b, int code)
{
switch (code) {
case 0: return a == b;
case 1: return a != b;
case 2: return a < b;
case 3: return a >= b;
case 4: return a > b;
case 5: return a <= b;
}
}
void math_cmp_test(void)
{
double nan = 0.0/0.0;
double one = 1.0;
double two = 2.0;
int comp = 0;
#define bug(a,b,op,iop,part) printf("Test broken: %s %s %s %s %d\n", #a, #b, #op, #iop, part)
/* This asserts that "a op b" is _not_ true, but "a iop b" is true.
And it does this in various ways so that all code generation paths
are checked (generating inverted tests, or non-inverted tests, or
producing a 0/1 value without jumps (that's done in the fcompare
function). */
#define FCMP(a,b,op,iop,code) \
if (fcompare (a,b,code)) \
bug (a,b,op,iop,1); \
if (a op b) \
bug (a,b,op,iop,2); \
if (a iop b) \
; \
else \
bug (a,b,op,iop,3); \
if ((a op b) || comp) \
bug (a,b,op,iop,4); \
if ((a iop b) || comp) \
; \
else \
bug (a,b,op,iop,5);
/* Equality tests. */
FCMP(nan, nan, ==, !=, 0);
FCMP(one, two, ==, !=, 0);
FCMP(one, one, !=, ==, 1);
/* Non-equality is a bit special. */
if (!fcompare (nan, nan, 1))
bug (nan, nan, !=, ==, 6);
/* Relational tests on numbers. */
FCMP(two, one, <, >=, 2);
FCMP(one, two, >=, <, 3);
FCMP(one, two, >, <=, 4);
FCMP(two, one, <=, >, 5);
/* Relational tests on NaNs. Note that the inverse op here is
always !=, there's no operator in C that is equivalent to !(a < b),
when NaNs are involved, same for the other relational ops. */
FCMP(nan, nan, <, !=, 2);
FCMP(nan, nan, >=, !=, 3);
FCMP(nan, nan, >, !=, 4);
FCMP(nan, nan, <=, !=, 5);
}
double get100 () { return 100.0; }
void callsave_test(void)
{
#if defined __i386__ || defined __x86_64__ || defined __arm__
int i, s; double *d; double t;
s = sizeof (double);
printf ("callsavetest: %d\n", s);
d = alloca (sizeof(double));
d[0] = 10.0;
/* x86-64 had a bug were the next call to get100 would evict
the lvalue &d[0] as VT_LLOCAL, and the reload would be done
in int type, not pointer type. When alloca returns a pointer
with the high 32 bit set (which is likely on x86-64) the access
generates a segfault. */
i = d[0] > get100 ();
printf ("%d\n", i);
#endif
}
void bfa3(ptrdiff_t str_offset)
{
printf("bfa3: %s\n", (char *)__builtin_frame_address(3) + str_offset);
}
void bfa2(ptrdiff_t str_offset)
{
printf("bfa2: %s\n", (char *)__builtin_frame_address(2) + str_offset);
bfa3(str_offset);
}
void bfa1(ptrdiff_t str_offset)
{
printf("bfa1: %s\n", (char *)__builtin_frame_address(1) + str_offset);
bfa2(str_offset);
}
void builtin_frame_address_test(void)
{
/* builtin_frame_address fails on ARM with gcc which make test3 fail */
#ifndef __arm__
char str[] = "__builtin_frame_address";
char *fp0 = __builtin_frame_address(0);
printf("str: %s\n", str);
bfa1(str-fp0);
#endif
}
char via_volatile (char i)
{
char volatile vi;
vi = i;
return vi;
}
( run in 1.150 second using v1.01-cache-2.11-cpan-13bb782fe5a )