Alien-FreeImage
view release on metacpan or search on metacpan
src/Source/LibJPEG/jdmainct.c view on Meta::CPAN
/*
* jdmainct.c
*
* Copyright (C) 1994-1996, Thomas G. Lane.
* Modified 2002-2012 by Guido Vollbeding.
* This file is part of the Independent JPEG Group's software.
* For conditions of distribution and use, see the accompanying README file.
*
* This file contains the main buffer controller for decompression.
* The main buffer lies between the JPEG decompressor proper and the
* post-processor; it holds downsampled data in the JPEG colorspace.
*
* Note that this code is bypassed in raw-data mode, since the application
* supplies the equivalent of the main buffer in that case.
*/
#define JPEG_INTERNALS
#include "jinclude.h"
#include "jpeglib.h"
/*
* In the current system design, the main buffer need never be a full-image
* buffer; any full-height buffers will be found inside the coefficient or
* postprocessing controllers. Nonetheless, the main controller is not
* trivial. Its responsibility is to provide context rows for upsampling/
* rescaling, and doing this in an efficient fashion is a bit tricky.
*
* Postprocessor input data is counted in "row groups". A row group
* is defined to be (v_samp_factor * DCT_scaled_size / min_DCT_scaled_size)
* sample rows of each component. (We require DCT_scaled_size values to be
* chosen such that these numbers are integers. In practice DCT_scaled_size
* values will likely be powers of two, so we actually have the stronger
* condition that DCT_scaled_size / min_DCT_scaled_size is an integer.)
* Upsampling will typically produce max_v_samp_factor pixel rows from each
* row group (times any additional scale factor that the upsampler is
* applying).
*
* The coefficient controller will deliver data to us one iMCU row at a time;
* each iMCU row contains v_samp_factor * DCT_scaled_size sample rows, or
* exactly min_DCT_scaled_size row groups. (This amount of data corresponds
* to one row of MCUs when the image is fully interleaved.) Note that the
* number of sample rows varies across components, but the number of row
* groups does not. Some garbage sample rows may be included in the last iMCU
* row at the bottom of the image.
*
* Depending on the vertical scaling algorithm used, the upsampler may need
* access to the sample row(s) above and below its current input row group.
* The upsampler is required to set need_context_rows TRUE at global selection
* time if so. When need_context_rows is FALSE, this controller can simply
* obtain one iMCU row at a time from the coefficient controller and dole it
* out as row groups to the postprocessor.
*
* When need_context_rows is TRUE, this controller guarantees that the buffer
* passed to postprocessing contains at least one row group's worth of samples
* above and below the row group(s) being processed. Note that the context
* rows "above" the first passed row group appear at negative row offsets in
* the passed buffer. At the top and bottom of the image, the required
* context rows are manufactured by duplicating the first or last real sample
* row; this avoids having special cases in the upsampling inner loops.
*
* The amount of context is fixed at one row group just because that's a
* convenient number for this controller to work with. The existing
* upsamplers really only need one sample row of context. An upsampler
* supporting arbitrary output rescaling might wish for more than one row
* group of context when shrinking the image; tough, we don't handle that.
* (This is justified by the assumption that downsizing will be handled mostly
* by adjusting the DCT_scaled_size values, so that the actual scale factor at
* the upsample step needn't be much less than one.)
*
* To provide the desired context, we have to retain the last two row groups
* of one iMCU row while reading in the next iMCU row. (The last row group
* can't be processed until we have another row group for its below-context,
* and so we have to save the next-to-last group too for its above-context.)
* We could do this most simply by copying data around in our buffer, but
* that'd be very slow. We can avoid copying any data by creating a rather
* strange pointer structure. Here's how it works. We allocate a workspace
* consisting of M+2 row groups (where M = min_DCT_scaled_size is the number
* of row groups per iMCU row). We create two sets of redundant pointers to
* the workspace. Labeling the physical row groups 0 to M+1, the synthesized
* pointer lists look like this:
* M+1 M-1
* master pointer --> 0 master pointer --> 0
* 1 1
* ... ...
* M-3 M-3
* M-2 M
* M-1 M+1
* M M-2
* M+1 M-1
* 0 0
* We read alternate iMCU rows using each master pointer; thus the last two
* row groups of the previous iMCU row remain un-overwritten in the workspace.
* The pointer lists are set up so that the required context rows appear to
* be adjacent to the proper places when we pass the pointer lists to the
* upsampler.
*
* The above pictures describe the normal state of the pointer lists.
* At top and bottom of the image, we diddle the pointer lists to duplicate
* the first or last sample row as necessary (this is cheaper than copying
* sample rows around).
*
* This scheme breaks down if M < 2, ie, min_DCT_scaled_size is 1. In that
* situation each iMCU row provides only one row group so the buffering logic
* must be different (eg, we must read two iMCU rows before we can emit the
* first row group). For now, we simply do not support providing context
* rows when min_DCT_scaled_size is 1. That combination seems unlikely to
* be worth providing --- if someone wants a 1/8th-size preview, they probably
* want it quick and dirty, so a context-free upsampler is sufficient.
( run in 1.346 second using v1.01-cache-2.11-cpan-385001e3568 )