Benchmark-Perl-Formance-Cargo

 view release on metacpan or  search on metacpan

share/SpamAssassin/easy_ham_2/00004.b2ed6c3c62bbdfab7683d60e214d1445  view on Meta::CPAN

> off the bottom, and not be shown).
> 
> I'd also prefer it if that window had no unusual background colouring,
> just one constant colour - I have been running the unseen window with
> background black, on a root window that is all black, with no borders or
> other decorations, but made "sticky" - the appearance is just like the
> folders with unseen messages (and their counts) are written into the
> root window (because it is sticky, this small display follows me around
> and do I can see when new mail needs processing).
> 
> I also find that I tend to have a bunch of sequences that only ever occur
> in one folder (some I had forgotten I ever created).  So in addition to
> the "sequences to always show" and "sequences to never show", a
> preference to only show sequences that occur in more than one folder
> would be useful, and then have the sequences that occor only in the
> folder I'm visiting appear in the list when that folder is current.
> This is just to keep the list size somewhat manageable while remaining
> productive (I quite often use a sequence to remember a particular message
> in a folder - the name is used only there, and only for one message,
> it gives me a handle on the message which remains as the folder is
> packed, sorted, etc).
> 
> I haven't updated my exmh for some time now, so I'm not sure if this
> next one is new, or just new since 2.5, but the Sequences menu (on the
> bar with New Flist Search ...) only contains "unseen" and "urgent".
> It would be useful if it contained all of the sequences that the folder
> happens to have defined.   A "New sequence" entry would also be useful
> (to mark the message with a sequence name that didn't previously exist,
> which can be done now using "Search" and the pick interface, but is
> clumsy that way)
> 
> Actually, you once could, now when I try this, entering a sequence name
> in the pick box, and a single message number, or a range N-N in the
> list of messages, and no pick attributes at all, I now get ...
> 
> syntax error in expression "int(1+1+(1 hit-1)*(3868-1-2)/(4878-1))"
>     while executing
> "expr int($minlineno+1+($msgid-$minmsgid)*($maxlineno-$minlineno-2)/($maxms
> gid-$minmsgid))"
>     (procedure "Ftoc_FindMsg" line 46)
>     invoked from within
> "Ftoc_FindMsg $msg"
>     (procedure "Ftoc_FindMsgs" line 5)
>     invoked from within
> "Ftoc_FindMsgs $msgids"
>     (procedure "Ftoc_PickMsgs" line 5)
>     invoked from within
> "Ftoc_PickMsgs $pick(ids) $pick(addtosel)"
>     (procedure "PickInner" line 13)
>     invoked from within
> "PickInner {exec pick +inbox -list} {4852 -sequence mercury}"
>     ("uplevel" body line 1)
>     invoked from within
> "uplevel #0 $cmd"
>     (procedure "busyCursorInner" line 8)
>     invoked from within
> "busyCursorInner $cmd $widgets"
>     (procedure "busyCursorHack" line 32)
>     invoked from within
> "busyCursorHack $args"
>     ("cursor" arm line 1)
>     invoked from within
> "switch $busy(style) {
> 	icon		{busyIcon $args}
> 	cursorAll	{busyCursor $args}
> 	cursor		{busyCursorHack $args}
> 	default		{eval $args}
>     }"
>     (procedure "busy" line 3)
>     invoked from within
> "busy PickInner $cmd $msgs"
>     (procedure "Pick_It" line 51)
>     invoked from within
> "Pick_It"
>     invoked from within
> ".pick.but.pick invoke"
>     ("uplevel" body line 1)
>     invoked from within
> "uplevel #0 [list $w invoke]"
>     (procedure "tkButtonUp" line 7)
>     invoked from within
> "tkButtonUp .pick.but.pick
> "
>     (command bound to event)
> 
> It has been ages since I did this last though.   I tried adding a Subject
> to pick on (easy as I know what's in the message...) which made no differen
> ce.
> Looks as if something is now saying "1 hit" when before it didn't, or
> similar.
> 
>   | I've also changed the ftoc colorization as discussed briefly on the lis
> t a 
>   | week or so ago.
> 
> Any chance of making the current message a little brighter background?
> Just to make it stand out a fraction more than it does (maybe this is
> more apparent to me than many, as I use very small fonts everywhere,
> the background of the ftoc line isn't very wide).
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> kre
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Exmh-workers mailing list
> Exmh-workers@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers

-- 
Chris Garrigues                 http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO                          http://www.virCIO.Com
716 Congress, Suite 200
Austin, TX  78701		+1 512 374 0500

  World War III:  The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers.




--==_Exmh_-195849857P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----



( run in 0.701 second using v1.01-cache-2.11-cpan-5a3173703d6 )