view release on metacpan or  search on metacpan

share/SpamAssassin/easy_ham/01131.f0a4fc8a86ce5529ae7e96e86de6ad2f  view on Meta::CPAN

X-Image-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/chris.gif
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
    boundary="==_Exmh_-1590407866P";
    micalg=pgp-sha1;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1032819600.20949.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com>
From: Chris Garrigues <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>
X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.57
Reply-To: Chris Garrigues <cwg-dated-1033251601.98fee1@DeepEddy.Com>
X-Loop: exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org
Sender: exmh-workers-admin@spamassassin.taint.org
Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-workers-request@spamassassin.taint.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.spamassassin.taint.org/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers <exmh-workers.spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.spamassassin.taint.org/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.spamassassin.taint.org/mailman/private/exmh-workers/>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:19:59 -0500

--==_Exmh_-1590407866P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

> From:  Scott Lipcon <slipcon@mercea.net>
> Date:  Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:49:47 -0400
>
> Chris, 
> 
> I'm home now, and this copy of exmh is pretty bad -  I'm running from
> CVS on Sunday night - the only change since then was the one you made
> this morning for "bulletproofing in MhReadSeqs".
> 
> I run exmh, and I can visably see it count up the number of unseen
> messages as it looks through the folders - I have about 3000 unseen
> messages in maybe 10 or 12 folders.    It takes a few seconds for all
> of the folders in the fcache to turn blue.  

This is true...it's now looking at more than just unseen, so it takes a little 
while (in the background) to build the sequences window.  There is probably 
some tuning possible in this area.

> In +inbox, I have 4 unread messages.  They aren't blue, they are
> white background with a normal colored font.

I changed the default display of unseen messages from a foreground of blue to 
a background of white to make it possible to see what other sequences unseen 
messages may be in.  I *did* ask Brent before I did it.  If you like the old 
behavior, the old lines are still in app-defaults-color, but commented out.

> If I click on a message, I get the following traceback:
> 
> invalid command name "Mh_MarkSeen"
>     while executing
> "Mh_MarkSeen $exmh(folder) $msgid"
>     (procedure "Hook_MsgShow_update_unseen" line 5)
>     invoked from within
> "$cmd $mhProfile(path)/$exmh(folder)/$msgid mimeHdr"
>     (procedure "MsgShow" line 23)
>     invoked from within
> "MsgShow $msgid"
>     (procedure "MsgChange" line 18)
>     invoked from within
> "MsgChange 66 show"
>     invoked from within
> "time [list MsgChange $msgid $show"
>     (procedure "Msg_Change" line 3)
>     invoked from within
> "Msg_Change $msgNum $show"
>     (procedure "Msg_Pick" line 8)
>     invoked from within
> "Msg_Pick $lineno show"
>     (procedure "FtocRangeEnd" line 12)
>     invoked from within
> "FtocRangeEnd [lindex [split [.ftoc.t index current] .] 0] 0"
>     (command bound to event)

This is because of your Hook_MsgShow_update_unseen which is calling a function 
which no longer exists.

I suspect you need
	Seq_Del $exmh(folder) unseen $msgid
now instead of 
	Mh_MarkSeen $exmh(folder) $msgid

> It appears that the message does get marked as seen though, as it
> loses the white background, and nmh reports the same.  
> 
> If I click the flist button, it zero's the unseen count, and then
> there is again a visible delay as it counts up all the unseen 
> messages - maybe 3-4 seconds.
> 
> I really think my installation is OK now, but if this behavior is just
> really strange I'll blow everything away and reinstall.  I'm happy to
> spend some time helping to track this down, I don't really need exmh.
> I'm comfortable enough using nmh.
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Exmh-workers mailing list
> Exmh-workers@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers

-- 
Chris Garrigues                 http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO                          http://www.virCIO.Com
716 Congress, Suite 200
Austin, TX  78701		+1 512 374 0500

  World War III:  The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers.




--==_Exmh_-1590407866P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.2_20000822 06/23/2000

iD8DBQE9j5OPK9b4h5R0IUIRAqAyAJ4t1/YU6tI+81tfv8PS65DO9DiXdACfYxBP
V0bKP6O4yRQjD38MQMxeWcM=
=85Yk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-1590407866P--



_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
Exmh-workers@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers