Benchmark-Perl-Formance-Cargo

 view release on metacpan or  search on metacpan

share/SpamAssassin/easy_ham/00973.42545038686536033b1032380502ae09  view on Meta::CPAN

List-Subscribe: <https://listman.spamassassin.taint.org/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
    <mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users <exmh-users.spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.spamassassin.taint.org/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
    <mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.spamassassin.taint.org/mailman/private/exmh-users/>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 19:01:49 -0700

2 things - first, the switch parser changed in a subtle way with 8.4 -
byte-code compilation was added, and it is slightly more strict in
its parsing than the original parser.  You can only have a comment where
Tcl would expect to find a command.  Switch has a "pattern - body"
strucutre, so if you goof and put a comment where it is trying to find
a pattern, both of you will be confused with the results.  The
subtlty arises with extra whitespace and newlines. I can't give you
the exact case, but I know exmh had one example that stopped parsing
correctly, and was arguably wrong before.

2nd - I've managed to remain fairly ignoranat of the PGP support in
exmh, so you'll have to dig in yourself or see if someone else on
exmh-users or exmh-workers is having similar problems.

>>>Reg Clemens said:
 > > If you haven't already, you should enable the debug log under
 > > Hacking Support preferences and look for clues there.
 > > 
 > > >>>Reg Clemens said:
 > >  > > Hi,
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > On Sun, 01 Sep 2002 00:05:03 MDT Reg Clemens wrote: 
 > >  > >   
 > >  > > [...]
 > >  > > > in messages with GnuPG signatures.  But punching the line ALWAYS
 > >  > > > gives
 > >  > > > 
 > >  > > >         Signature made Thu Aug 29 00:27:17 2002 MDT using DSA key I
     D BDD
 > >      F997A
 > >  > > >         Can't check signature: public key not found
 > >  > > > 
 > >  > > > So, something else is missing.
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > Yes, the public key of the signature you want to check :-).
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > Are you really sure that you have the public key of the message's
 > >  > > signature? If not, try downloading it or try to check a signature fro
     m
 > >  > > which you know you have the public key.
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > 
 > >  > 
 > >  > Ah, sorry for not making that clearer.
 > >  > But no.
 > >  > Previously (v1.0.6 of GnuPG) there would be a slight pause at this poin
     t whi
 > >      le
 > >  > it went out to get the public key from a keyserver.
 > >  > Now, whether I have the key or NOT, I get the failure message.
 > >  > 
 > >  > Its as if it cant find gpg to execute it (but I fixed that path), so th
     ere
 > >  > must be something else that I am missing...
 > >  > 
 > >  > 
 > >  > -- 
 > >  >                                         Reg.Clemens
 > >  >                                         reg@dwf.com
 > >  > 
 > >  > 
 > >  > 
 > >  > 
 > >  > _______________________________________________
 > >  > Exmh-users mailing list
 > >  > Exmh-users@redhat.com
 > >  > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users
 > > 
 > > --
 > > Brent Welch
 > > Software Architect, Panasas Inc
 > > Pioneering the World's Most Scalable and Agile Storage Network
 > > www.panasas.com
 > > welch@panasas.com
 > > 
 > 
 > 
 > Partial solution.
 > And this MAY be related to using tcl/tk 8.4b1, as I had a similar
 > problem about a month ago elsewhere in EXMH (which you found).
 > 
 > But first.
 > I really feel like something has changed out from under me
 > with my making no changes to EXMH.  Namely, when I first got
 > GPG up and working (for reading signatures) all I did was
 > touch the 'Check Signature' button' and it went out and queried
 > the keyserver for me.
 > Now Im getting a separate box, after the failure to find the
 > public key on my keyring, asking me of I want to 'Query keyserver'
 > 
 > I KNOW that I never had to touch a 'Query keyserver' button in
 > the past, but there it is now, and I havent touched EXMH. Spooky.
 > 
 > I have been working back and forth between GPG 1.0.6 and 1.0.7
 > but its not clear how that could be the problem, as Im now getting
 > the 'Query' message when running either...
 > 
 > ---
 > 
 > OK, enough about my confusion.
 > The CURRENT problem seems to be a COMMENT in a SWITCH statement
 > at line 86 in pgpWWW.tcl.  Tcl 8.4b1 doesnt like it and I get your
 > popup box.  Remove it and no popupbox, but EXMH hangs (sigh).
 > So, not a complete solution, but at least a start.
 > 
 > Thanks for the interest.
 > 
 > 					Reg.Clemens
 > 					reg@dwf.com

--
Brent Welch



( run in 0.758 second using v1.01-cache-2.11-cpan-364913b4093 )