view release on metacpan or  search on metacpan

share/SpamAssassin/easy_ham/00461.94c0b7cab722e5ac253b285e50b047e1  view on Meta::CPAN

From fork-admin@xent.com  Fri Sep  6 11:42:49 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62F416F21
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri,  6 Sep 2002 11:40:03 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:40:03 +0100 (IST)
Received: from webnote.net (mail.webnote.net [193.120.211.219]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g869sQC29417 for
    <jm@jmason.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:54:27 +0100
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by webnote.net (8.9.3/8.9.3)
    with ESMTP id WAA18845 for <jm@jmason.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 22:59:23 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 0EA7B294256; Thu,  5 Sep 2002 14:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (mta03-svc.ntlworld.com
    [62.253.162.43]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF662940AA for
    <fork@xent.com>; Thu,  5 Sep 2002 14:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cynosure.stanford.edu ([80.7.27.124]) by
    mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626)
    with ESMTP id
    <20020905215753.IAUL23840.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@cynosure.stanford.edu>
    for <fork@xent.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 22:57:53 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020905040452.04b51b88@rescomp.stanford.edu>
X-Sender: extant@rescomp.stanford.edu (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
From: Hussein Kanji <hussein@stanfordalumni.org>
Subject: RE: sprint delivers the next big thing??
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 04:14:26 -0700

i agree with rob. i think if the phones (and mms is building traction in europe in handsets), this might be interesting. bottom line is will it a) help sell phones and b) bill enough time on the wcarriers networks?

anyone remember the polariod photo sticker fad? low quality, small in size. but kids totally dug that stuff. seems like every adolescent girl had that stuff at one point. and it never replaced or aimed to replace digital cameras or normal photographs...

-h

>From: "Rob Shavell" <rob@mobiusvc.com>
>To: "'Mike Masnick'" <mike@techdirt.com>
>Cc: <fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
>Subject: RE: sprint delivers the next big thing??
>Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 01:10:50 -0700
>
>right Mike,
>
>i will agree to disagree but i take your comments to heart.  my opinion is
>only that this is one of the last frontiers of communications ('instant
>show') that we cross easily (though you are right as rain on pricing).  i am
>mildly amused at the level of skepticism and innatention it is getting.
>
>my premise is that the world will change in dramatic and unexpected ways
>once there are a billion 'eye's' which can instantly share what they see
>amongst each other.  that doesn't mean that people will stop talking on
>their phones, or that people will spend more time w/images than voice.  just
>that it is fundamental.  from news to crime to privacy to dating to family
>life to bloopers and practical jokes, i believe there will be an explosion
>of images unleashed specifically by cell phone integrated lenses because of
>their utter ubiquity that dwarfs all pictures taken in the history of
>photography by orders of magnitude and in short order. and yes, changes
>things 'big time'.
>
>rgds,
>rob
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mike Masnick [mailto:mike@techdirt.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 11:58 PM
>To: Rob Shavell
>Cc: fork@spamassassin.taint.org