view release on metacpan or  search on metacpan

share/SpamAssassin/easy_ham/00321.c3dda1549b97568144b8290208504673  view on Meta::CPAN

From fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Aug 26 21:57:51 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E472D43F9B
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:57:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:57:50 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QKwdZ09291 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:58:39 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 4863F2941CA; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from plato.einstein (unknown [65.170.226.173]) by xent.com
    (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80D0294099 for <fork@xent.com>; Wed,
    21 Aug 2002 01:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RSHAVELL ([209.151.242.53]) by plato.einstein with
    Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.3779); Wed, 21 Aug 2002 01:10:12 -0700
From: "Rob Shavell" <rob@mobiusvc.com>
To: "'Mike Masnick'" <mike@techdirt.com>
Cc: <fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
Subject: RE: sprint delivers the next big thing??
Message-Id: <000301c248ea$43c44ac0$0601a8c0@einstein>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20020820234041.03213bd0@techdirt.com>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Importance: Normal
X-Originalarrivaltime: 21 Aug 2002 08:10:12.0401 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C62BA10:01C248EA]
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 01:10:50 -0700

right Mike,

i will agree to disagree but i take your comments to heart.  my opinion is
only that this is one of the last frontiers of communications ('instant
show') that we cross easily (though you are right as rain on pricing).  i am
mildly amused at the level of skepticism and innatention it is getting.

my premise is that the world will change in dramatic and unexpected ways
once there are a billion 'eye's' which can instantly share what they see
amongst each other.  that doesn't mean that people will stop talking on
their phones, or that people will spend more time w/images than voice.  just
that it is fundamental.  from news to crime to privacy to dating to family
life to bloopers and practical jokes, i believe there will be an explosion
of images unleashed specifically by cell phone integrated lenses because of
their utter ubiquity that dwarfs all pictures taken in the history of
photography by orders of magnitude and in short order. and yes, changes
things 'big time'.

rgds,
rob


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Masnick [mailto:mike@techdirt.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 11:58 PM
To: Rob Shavell
Cc: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Subject: RE: sprint delivers the next big thing??


Not to keep harping on this, but...

At 11:36 PM 8/20/02 -0700, Rob Shavell wrote:

>content: who cares about content?  that no one can think of 'useful'
content
>is always the business persons mistake. the content is the users
>communications.  its anything and everything.  avg person could easily send
>half dozen pics to a dozen people a day.  mainly humorous i'd guess. who
>cares if content is trivial in nature. picture speaks a thousand words.

This does nothing to answer my question.  I *do* care about content.  Hell,
if I could be convinced that people would send stupid pics back and forth