view release on metacpan or  search on metacpan

share/SpamAssassin/easy_ham/00026.f9755fb0cee92676d7bd76d32bc5f50f  view on Meta::CPAN

From fork-admin@xent.com  Fri Aug 23 11:08:20 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: zzzz@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D8944160
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:06:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:06:44 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MIPTZ19588 for <zzzz@spamassassin.taint.org>;
    Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:25:29 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 94BC22940D4; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost.localdomain (pm7-32.sba1.netlojix.net
    [207.71.222.128]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7AD294099 for
    <fork@xent.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from dave@localhost) by maltesecat (8.8.7/8.8.7a) id LAA21283;
    Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:11:58 -0700
Message-Id: <200208221811.LAA21283@maltesecat>
To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Subject: RE: The Curse of India's Socialism
In-Reply-To: Message from fork-request@xent.com of
    "Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:30:03 PDT."
    <20020821183003.25673.41476.Mailman@lair.xent.com>
From: Dave Long <dl@silcom.com>
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:11:57 -0700



>                                 You have multiple generations of
> peasants/squatters that cultivate and live on the lands almost as a
> human parts of the property package.

When I'd read that "getting legal title
can take 20 years", when I believe that
1 year ought to be more than sufficient,
(and helped by the Cairo reference) I'd
assumed that we were talking about the
urban poor.

If I see people living in mansions, or
even in suburban subdivisions, I assume
they didn't have too much trouble with
their titles.

If I see people living in shanties and
haphazard alleyways, I tend to assume
their parcels weren't exactly recorded
on the government maps, or paid for with
a bank loan, especially when nearby vacant
lots have shotgun wielding men presumably
intent on keeping them "development" free.

Now, it may be that "Manhattanites' view
of America" to say that outside of Metro
Manila, Davao, and maybe another city or
two (Cebu?), everything else (literally)
is the boondocks.  But going on that very
broad assumption, I guess I'm describing
the flip side of Mr. Roger's experience:
the paisanos (who leave behind those who
remain on a patron's rural land) move to
Manila, and (the second assumption) squat
in shantytowns there, at least until they
can line up a middle-class job.

So, going on two large assumptions, I can
come up with a scenario under which title
would take 20 years: a shantytown arises
somewhere in the midst of a section (or
whatever the Spanish used to divvy up the
land) and it takes decades of arguing to
put together a package which somehow can
both compensate the owner and record lots
for the inhabitants.  Just transferring
title to an existing lot, between parties
who have money, ought not to be a problem.

The obvious solution, at least to us
barking farting chihuahuas on FoRK, is