Acme-Magic8Ball
view release on metacpan or search on metacpan
lib/Acme/Magic8Ball.pm view on Meta::CPAN
require Exporter;
use vars qw($VERSION $CONSISTENT @EXPORT_OK @ISA);
# are we ever going to need enhancements? Apparently yes :(
$VERSION = "1.3";
$CONSISTENT = 0;
@ISA = qw(Exporter);
@EXPORT_OK = qw(ask);
use Data::Dumper;
sub import {
$CONSISTENT = grep { /^:consistent$/ } @_;
@_ = grep { !/^:consistent$/ } @_;
goto &Exporter::import;
}
=head1 NAME
Acme::Magic8Ball - ask the Magic 8 Ball a question
=head1 SYNOPSIS
use Acme::Magic8Ball qw(ask);
my $reply = ask("Is this module any use whatsoever?");
... you can also pass in your own list of answers ...
my $reply = ask("What should the next bit be?", 0, 1); # reply will always be 0 or 1
... or make answers consistent ...
use Acme::Magic8Ball qw(ask :consistent);
for (0..1000) {
my $reply = ask("Is this module any use whatsoever?"); # reply will always be the same
}
=head1 DESCRIPTION
This is an almost utterly pointless module. But I needed it. So there.
=head1 METHODS
=head2 ask <question> [answers]
Ask and ye shall receive!
If you don't pass in an array of answers it will use the traditional ones.
=cut
sub ask {
my $question = shift || return "You must ask a question!";
my @answers = @_;
unless (@answers) {
my $pos = tell DATA;
@answers = map { chomp; $_ } <DATA>;
seek DATA, $pos,0;
}
return $answers[rand @answers] unless $CONSISTENT;
my $hashcode = 0;
$hashcode += ord($_) foreach split(//, $question);
return $answers[$hashcode % scalar(@answers) - 1];
}
=head1 AUTHOR
Simon Wistow <simon@thegestalt.org>
=head1 COPYING
Copyright 2005, Simon Wistow
Distributed under the same terms as Perl itself.
=head1 DEVELOPMENT
You can get the latest version from
https://github.com/simonwistow/Acme-Magic8Ball
=head1 SEE ALSO
The 8 Ball FAQ - http://8ball.ofb.net/faq.html
Mattel (who own the 8 Ball) - http://www.mattel.com
=cut
__DATA__
Signs point to yes.
Yes.
Reply hazy, try again.
Without a doubt.
My sources say no.
As I see it, yes.
You may rely on it.
Concentrate and ask again.
Outlook not so good.
It is decidedly so.
Better not tell you now.
Very doubtful.
Yes - definitely.
It is certain.
Cannot predict now.
Most likely.
Ask again later.
My reply is no.
Outlook good.
Don't count on it.
( run in 0.592 second using v1.01-cache-2.11-cpan-39bf76dae61 )