Algorithm-VSM
view release on metacpan or search on metacpan
examples/significance_testing.pl view on Meta::CPAN
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
## significance_testing.pl
## See Item 11 in the README of the `examples' directory.
use strict;
use Algorithm::VSM;
my $debug_signi = 0;
die "Must supply one command-line argument, which must either be 'randomization' or 't-test'\n"
unless @ARGV == 1;
my $significance_testing_method = shift @ARGV;
die "The command-line argument must either be 'randomization' or " .
"'t-test' for this module to be useful\n"
if ($significance_testing_method ne 'randomization') and
($significance_testing_method ne 't-test');
print "Proceeding with significance testing based on $significance_testing_method\n";
my $MAX_ITERATIONS = 100000;
my $THRESHOLD_1 = 0.02; # for LSA-1
my $THRESHOLD_2 = 0.12; # for LSA-2
my $corpus_dir = "corpus";
my $query_file = "test_queries.txt";
my $stop_words_file = "stop_words.txt";
my $relevancy_file = "relevancy.txt";
# Significance testing is applied to the output of two retrieval
# algorithms. We want to know if the difference between the MAP values
# for the two algorithms are statistically significant. Our example here
# is based to LSA retrieval algorithms with different values for the
# singular value acceptance threshold lsa_svd_threshold. Under the
# null hypothesis, we assume that the two algorithms are the same.
# Our test statistic will be the difference between the MAP values.
######################## Algorithm 1 #########################
my $lsa1 = Algorithm::VSM->new(
break_camelcased_and_underscored => 1, # default: 1
case_sensitive => 0, # default: 0
corpus_directory => $corpus_dir,
file_types => ['.txt', '.java'],
lsa_svd_threshold => $THRESHOLD_1,
min_word_length => 4,
query_file => $query_file,
relevancy_file => $relevancy_file,
stop_words_file => $stop_words_file,
want_stemming => 1, # default: 0
);
$lsa1->get_corpus_vocabulary_and_word_counts();
$lsa1->generate_document_vectors();
$lsa1->construct_lsa_model();
$lsa1->upload_document_relevancies_from_file();
$lsa1->precision_and_recall_calculator('lsa');
my $avg_precisions_1 = $lsa1->get_query_sorted_average_precision_for_queries();
my $MAP_Algo_1 = 0;
map {$MAP_Algo_1 += $_} @$avg_precisions_1;
$MAP_Algo_1 /= @$avg_precisions_1;
print "MAP value for LSA-1: $MAP_Algo_1\n";
print "Avg precisions for LSA-1: @$avg_precisions_1\n"
if $debug_signi;
######################## Algorithm 2 #########################
my $lsa2 = Algorithm::VSM->new(
break_camelcased_and_underscored => 1, # default: 1
case_sensitive => 0, # default: 0
corpus_directory => $corpus_dir,
file_types => ['.txt', '.java'],
lsa_svd_threshold => $THRESHOLD_2,
min_word_length => 4,
query_file => $query_file,
relevancy_file => $relevancy_file,
stop_words_file => $stop_words_file,
want_stemming => 1, # default: 0
);
$lsa2->get_corpus_vocabulary_and_word_counts();
$lsa2->generate_document_vectors();
$lsa2->construct_lsa_model();
$lsa2->upload_document_relevancies_from_file();
$lsa2->precision_and_recall_calculator('lsa');
my $avg_precisions_2 = $lsa2->get_query_sorted_average_precision_for_queries();
my $MAP_Algo_2 = 0;
map {$MAP_Algo_2 += $_} @$avg_precisions_2;
$MAP_Algo_2 /= @$avg_precisions_2;
print "MAP value for LSA-2: $MAP_Algo_2\n";
print "Average precisions for LSA-2: @$avg_precisions_2\n"
if $debug_signi;
# This is the observed value for the test statistic that will be subject to
# significance testing:
my $OBSERVED_t = $MAP_Algo_1 - $MAP_Algo_2;
print "\n\nMAP Difference that will be Subject to Significance Testing: $OBSERVED_t\n\n";
######################## Significance Testing ######################
my @range = 0..@$avg_precisions_1-1;
if ($debug_signi) {
my $total_number_of_permutations = 2 ** @range;
print "\n\nTotal num of permuts $total_number_of_permutations\n\n";
}
# For each permutation of the algorithm labels over the queries, we
# will store the test_statistic in the array \@test_statistic.
my @test_statistic = ();
# At each iteration, we create a random permutation of the algo_1 and
# algo_2 labels over the queries as explained on slides 39 and 45 of my
# tutorial on Significance Testing. For each assignment of average
# precision values to algo_1, we calculate the MAP value for algo_1, and
# the same for algo_2. The difference between the two MAP values is the
# value of the test_statistic for that iteration. Our goal is create
# test_statistic values for, say, 100,000 iterations of this calculation.
my $iter = 0;
while (1) {
# Here is the logic we use for permuting the algo_1 and algo_2 labels
# over the average precision values. We first create a random
# permutation of the integers between 0 and the size of the query set.
# We refer to this permuted list as permuted_range in what follows.
# We then walk through the elements of the list permuted_range and at
# each position test when the value at that position is less than or
# greater than half the size of the number of queries. This
# determines which of the two avg. precision values for a given query
# gets algo_1 label and which gets the algo_2 label.
my @permuted_range = 0..@range-1;
fisher_yates_shuffle( \@permuted_range );
my @algo_1 = ();
my @algo_2 = ();
foreach (0..@range-1) {
if ($permuted_range[$_] < @range / 2.0) {
push @algo_1, $avg_precisions_1->[$_];
push @algo_2, $avg_precisions_2->[$_];
} else {
push @algo_1, $avg_precisions_2->[$_];
push @algo_2, $avg_precisions_1->[$_];
}
( run in 1.111 second using v1.01-cache-2.11-cpan-b16cb0d3907 )