view release on metacpan or  search on metacpan

devscripts/bench  view on Meta::CPAN

#!perl

# DATE
# VERSION

use 5.010001;
use strict;
use warnings;

use Benchmark::Command;
use FindBin '$Bin';

my $node_chalk;
{
    require File::Slurper;
    require File::Which;
    for (File::Which::which('chalk')) {
        my $content = File::Slurper::read_text($_);
        if ($content =~ /process\.stdin/) {
            $node_chalk = $_;
            last;
        }
    }
    die "Can't find node's chalk" unless $node_chalk;
}

Benchmark::Command::run(
    undef,
    {
        'perl (--help)' => [$^X, "$Bin/../bin/chalk", "--help"],
        'node (--help)' => [$node_chalk, "--help"],

        'perl (red bold str)' => [$^X, "$Bin/../bin/chalk", "red","bold","str"],
        'node (red bold str)' => [$node_chalk, "red", "bold", "str"],

        'perl (100_000 lines)' => sub {
            open my($fh), "| $^X $Bin/../bin/chalk red bold" or die $!;
            for (1..100_000) {
                print $fh "foo\n";
            }
            close $fh or die $!;
        },

        'node (100_000 lines)' => sub {
            open my($fh), "| $node_chalk red bold" or die $!;
            for (1..100_000) {
                print $fh "foo\n";
            }
            close $fh or die $!;
        },
    },
    {
        quiet => 1,
    },
);

# ABSTRACT: Benchmark node.js's chalk vs perl's
# PODNAME:

=head1 DESCRIPTION

node's chalk is still faster for processing stdin (6.5ms for 100ki lines vs
16.5ms for perl's chalk). This is probably because in perl's chalk we print ANSI
code and reset per line.