AFS-Command

 view release on metacpan or  search on metacpan

Changes.html  view on Meta::CPAN

    <HTML> 
	<HEAD> 
	    <TITLE>distro/Changes</TITLE> 
	</HEAD>

	<BODY>

<!-- INDEX BEGIN -->

<UL>

	<LI><A HREF="#CHanges_in_1_9">CHanges in 1.9</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Enhancements">Enhancements</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Changes_in_1_8">Changes in 1.8</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Bug_Fixes">Bug Fixes</A>
	<UL>

		<LI><A HREF="#vos_examine_did_not_pick_up_the_">vos examine did not pick up the LOCKED flag</A>
		<LI><A HREF="#pts_membership_error_checking_wa">pts membership error checking was bogus</A>
	</UL>

	<LI><A HREF="#Changes_in_1_7">Changes in 1.7</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Enhancements">Enhancements</A>
	<UL>

		<LI><A HREF="#Boolean_flags_can_be_turned_off_">Boolean flags can be turned off, as well as on</A>
	</UL>

	<LI><A HREF="#Bugs">Bugs</A>
	<UL>

		<LI><A HREF="#vos_examine_by_numeric_ID_did_no">vos examine by numeric ID did not parse Volume Headers</A>
	</UL>

	<LI><A HREF="#Changes_in_1_6">Changes in 1.6</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Enhancements">Enhancements</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Object_VolumeHeader_new_a">AFS::Object::VolumeHeader: new attribute 'attached'</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Bugs">Bugs</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Changes_in_1_5">Changes in 1.5</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Enhancements">Enhancements</A>
	<UL>

		<LI><A HREF="#Principal_names_as_user_supplie">Principal names, as user supplied arguments, are lowercased</A>
		<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Command_VOS_restore_argum">AFS::Command::VOS->restore arguments added</A>
	</UL>

	<LI><A HREF="#Bugs">Bugs</A>
	<UL>

		<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Object_VolumeHeader_acces">AFS::Object::VolumeHeader 'accesses' attribute was incorrect</A>
	</UL>

	<LI><A HREF="#Changes_in_1_4">Changes in 1.4</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Enhancements">Enhancements</A>
	<UL>

		<LI><A HREF="#Test_suite_is_disabled_by_defaul">Test suite is disabled by default.</A>
	</UL>

	<LI><A HREF="#Bugs">Bugs</A>
	<UL>

		<LI><A HREF="#Volume_status_value_inconsistenc">Volume status value inconsistency</A>
		<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Command_VOS_examine_parse">AFS::Command::VOS->examine parses busy and offline messages</A>
	</UL>

	<LI><A HREF="#Changes_in_1_3">Changes in 1.3</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Enhancements">Enhancements</A>
	<UL>

		<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Command_VOS_release_suppo">AFS::Command::VOS->release support both -f and -force</A>
	</UL>

	<LI><A HREF="#Bugs">Bugs</A>
	<UL>

		<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Command_BOS_listhosts">AFS::Command::BOS->listhosts</A>
	</UL>

	<LI><A HREF="#Changes_in_1_2">Changes in 1.2</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Enhancements">Enhancements</A>
	<UL>

		<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Command_VOS_offline_and">AFS::Command::VOS->offline() and ->online()</A>
	</UL>

	<LI><A HREF="#Bugs">Bugs</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Changes_in_1_1">Changes in 1.1</A>
	<LI><A HREF="#Enhancements">Enhancements</A>
	<UL>

		<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Command_VOS_status_">AFS::Command::VOS->status()</A>
		<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Object_VLDB_data_is_now_ke">AFS::Object::VLDB data is now keyed on volume ID, as well as name</A>
	</UL>

	<LI><A HREF="#Bugs">Bugs</A>
	<UL>

		<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Command_BOS_status">AFS::Command::BOS->status</A>
		<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Command_FS_several_metho">AFS::Command::FS->(several methods)</A>
		<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Command_FS_lsmount">AFS::Command::FS->lsmount</A>
		<LI><A HREF="#AFS_Command_FS_sysname">AFS::Command::FS->sysname</A>
	</UL>

</UL>
<!-- INDEX END -->

<HR>
<P>
<H1><A NAME="CHanges_in_1_9">CHanges in 1.9

</A></H1>
<P>
<HR>
<H1><A NAME="Enhancements">Enhancements

</A></H1>
A new argument is supported by AFS::Command::Base-&gt;new():


<P>

<PRE>    my $vos = AFS::Command::VOS-&gt;new( timestamps =&gt; 1 );
</PRE>

<P>

This will result in ISO timestamps being prepended to each line of output
when it is collected into the $vos-&gt;errors(). This is useful for
profiling the performance of operations such as vos release:


<P>

<PRE>    my $result = $vos-&gt;release
      (
       id               =&gt; 'somevol',
       cell             =&gt; 'somecell',
      ) || die $vos-&gt;errors();
</PRE>

<P>

When this works, the $vos-&gt;errors() will have the verbose output, which
can be logged even in the successful case, for diagnostics. Here's an
example for a failure:


<P>

<PRE>    [2004-11-18 17:20:36] Could not lock the VLDB entry for the volume 536998569.
    [2004-11-18 17:20:36] VLDB: no permission access for call
    [2004-11-18 17:20:36] Error in vos release command.
    [2004-11-18 17:20:36] VLDB: no permission access for call
</PRE>

<P>

<P>
<HR>
<H1><A NAME="Changes_in_1_8">Changes in 1.8

</A></H1>
<P>
<HR>
<H1><A NAME="Bug_Fixes">Bug Fixes

</A></H1>
<P>
<HR>
<H2><A NAME="vos_examine_did_not_pick_up_the_">vos examine did not pick up the LOCKED flag

</A></H2>
The code to parse the VLDB header was missing the LOCKED flag, if it was
present, so this attribute was not being set properly. It is now.


<P>

<P>
<HR>
<H2><A NAME="pts_membership_error_checking_wa">pts membership error checking was bogus

</A></H2>
Well, it still is bogus, actually, since the code has to deal with the fact
that pts has never produced meaningful return codes, so a failed pts
membership command can still exit 0, and we have to figure out if it failed
by other means. This is done by looking for the known error messages that
pts prints out, which is a good example of why parsing the ASCII test
output of commands like this is a weak architecture.


<P>

<P>
<HR>
<H1><A NAME="Changes_in_1_7">Changes in 1.7

</A></H1>
<P>
<HR>
<H1><A NAME="Enhancements">Enhancements

</A></H1>
<P>
<HR>
<H2><A NAME="Boolean_flags_can_be_turned_off_">Boolean flags can be turned off, as well as on

</A></H2>
If an argument to a method (and its corresponding command line argument)
doesn't take a value, it is treated like a Boolean flag. However, the code
used to assume that the existence of a Boolean key in the argument list
implied the Boolean argument was always true.


<P>

Now, the truth of the arguments <EM>value</EM> is tested to determine if the flag should be set on or off. This makes it
easy to have subroutines that just blindly pass certain arguments along,
without haing to test them, and allows for much cleaner code.


<P>

For example:


<P>

<PRE>    my $result = $vos-&gt;release
      (
       name             =&gt; $name,
       force            =&gt; $force,
      );
</PRE>

<P>

Will work as you probably expected it to, namely if <CODE>$force</CODE> is
zero, it will NOT be passed to the ``vos release'' command. In previous
releases, regardless of the value of $force, the mere existence of the
force key in the argument hash would have caused the -force option to be
used.


<P>

<P>

Changes.html  view on Meta::CPAN


<P>

The API for getVLDBEntry has changed, and the single argument usage:


<P>

<PRE>    getVLDBEntry($name)         # DEPRECATED!!!!
</PRE>

<P>

has been deprecated. If warnings are enabled (perl -w), then the API will
carp at you. In the next release (1.2), that usage will no longer be
supported. Upgrade your code, or pay the price.


<P>

The new usage of getVLDBEntry is one of:


<P>

<PRE>    getVLDBEntry( name =&gt; $name )
    getVLDBEntry( id =&gt; $id )
</PRE>

<P>

The internal method <CODE>_addEntry()</CODE> now manages the data by id as
well as name, but you're not supposed to know that anyway...


<P>

<P>
<HR>
<H1><A NAME="Bugs">Bugs

</A></H1>
<P>
<HR>
<H2><A NAME="AFS_Command_BOS_status">AFS::Command::BOS->status

</A></H2>
When querying a specific instance, if it wasn't there, the API would try to
add an undefined instance object to the result, and croak. Now, you just
get a result object with no instances.


<P>

<P>
<HR>
<H2><A NAME="AFS_Command_FS_several_metho">AFS::Command::FS->(several methods)

</A></H2>
If you pass a list of paths to methods such as <CODE>whichcell(),</CODE>
then the error handling was a bit intrusive. The way it used to work, in
1.0, was to return an error if we didn't see output for one or more of the
paths. Now, the code is more forgiving, and if have no idea what happened
for one of the given paths, we'll return a Path object for that path which
has a generic error.


<P>

<P>
<HR>
<H2><A NAME="AFS_Command_FS_lsmount">AFS::Command::FS->lsmount

</A></H2>
The ``File 'foo' doesn't exist'' error message wasn't trapped as a
recognized error. It is now.


<P>

<P>
<HR>
<H2><A NAME="AFS_Command_FS_sysname">AFS::Command::FS->sysname

</A></H2>
The pattern matching was a bit greedy and the trailing single quote was
showing up in the returned sysname value.


<P>

</DL>
    </BODY>

    </HTML>



( run in 0.607 second using v1.01-cache-2.11-cpan-adec679a428 )